<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Using PHP includes to easily edit your site&#8217;s static content!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/</link>
	<description>Relax and discuss</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dimitris</title>
	<link>http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/#comment-1021	</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevlounge.com/?p=68#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>@Kevin - Well I use mostly include. So If something happens and the "included" file is "missing" the script will continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin - Well I use mostly include. So If something happens and the &#8220;included&#8221; file is &#8220;missing&#8221; the script will continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Paul</title>
	<link>http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/#comment-806	</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevlounge.com/?p=68#comment-806</guid>
		<description>This is a real effective way of separating content from structure and making it easier on your clients to edit their content without having to sift through the layout code they don't need to worry about. Write a simple program that loads the external .php files and lets you edit and save them and your on your way to a nice CMS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a real effective way of separating content from structure and making it easier on your clients to edit their content without having to sift through the layout code they don&#8217;t need to worry about. Write a simple program that loads the external .php files and lets you edit and save them and your on your way to a nice CMS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kevin</title>
	<link>http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/#comment-776	</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevlounge.com/?p=68#comment-776</guid>
		<description>So what do you recommend using the most?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do you recommend using the most?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dimitris</title>
	<link>http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/#comment-768	</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevlounge.com/?p=68#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tut! Simple n effective!
@ Kevin -- The require() statement includes and evaluates the specific file.

require() includes and evaluates a specific file. Detailed information on how this inclusion works is described in the documentation for include().

require() and include() are identical in every way except how they handle failure. They both produce a Warning, but require() results in a Fatal Error. In other words, don't hesitate to use require() if you want a missing file to halt processing of the page. include() does not behave this way, the script will continue regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tut! Simple n effective!<br />
@ Kevin &#8212; The require() statement includes and evaluates the specific file.</p>
<p>require() includes and evaluates a specific file. Detailed information on how this inclusion works is described in the documentation for include().</p>
<p>require() and include() are identical in every way except how they handle failure. They both produce a Warning, but require() results in a Fatal Error. In other words, don&#8217;t hesitate to use require() if you want a missing file to halt processing of the page. include() does not behave this way, the script will continue regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kevin</title>
	<link>http://www.webdevlounge.com/php/using-php-includes-to-easily-edit-your-sites-static-content/#comment-613	</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevlounge.com/?p=68#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Why did you use require() instead of an include()?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you use require() instead of an include()?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>